The
advent of "looser" credit standards during
the past decade have created an overabundance of subprime
mortgages. These loans were already 3 points higher
than rates available to more creditworthy borrowers,
and now they're being raised again! Mortgage
companies make more profit on subprime loans than they
do on conventional loans and now things are getting
worse for those who can least afford it.
Approximately $1.2 billion in adjustable
rate mortgages will reset
to higher rates this year. Nearly half of that amount
is in the form of sub-prime mortgages. Dallas, Texas
is just one example of a market that has been flooded
with subprime and adjustable rate mortgages. Dallas,
which has the highest number of 30-day delinquent home
mortgage loans of the 28 major real estate markets in
the United States, recorded an astounding 4.05% of mortgage
loans that were 30 days or more delinquent in the latest
quarter.
When offered responsibility, subprime mortgages are certainly
legal. However, more and more evidence is showing that
certain lenders targeted specific individuals for subprime
lending – even individuals whose credit was good
enough to receive standard lending.
Subprime lenders are beginning to see legal action. For
instance, it was discovered that the Home Mortgage Disclosure
Act showed that black and Hispanic borrowers were more
likely to get subprime loans from Countrywide
Financial.
Countrywide agreed, with lots of pressure from the New
York attorney general, to adopt measures to prevent discriminatory
pricing for minority borrowers. The settlement agreement
suggests that Countrywide was steering minority borrowers
into higher cost loans.
If you have a subprime mortgage and you feel you may
have been inappropriately targeted or misled as to the
conditions, please contact
one of our attorneys by phone
or email. To find out more about other cases we handle,
select another case type on your left.
SUB-PRIME
BLOG ARTICLES:
Blog articles are written by Angel
Reyes To read other entries by Angel Reyes,
visit his blog at AngelReyesBlog.com.
3/9/07 - Hedge Funds Bet Wrong on Subprime Markets
3/5/07 - Subprime Troubles - The Music Has Stopped
2/19/07 - Mortgage Derivatives Decline
2/16/07 - Net Losses Keep Piling Up For Subprime
Lenders
2/15/07 - The Other Side of Sub-prime Mortgages
1/26/07 - Sub-prime Loans: Let the Buyer Beware!
1/8/07 - Sub-prime Loans... Blessing or Curse?
SUB-PRIME
MORTGAGE NEWS ARTICLES:
4/25/07 - Law.com; Subprime
Crash May Be a Boon to Attorneys
3/13/07 - CNNMoney; Scary math: More homes, fewer buyers
3/13/07 - AP Press; Late Mortgage Payments Reach High
2/23/07 - CNNMoney; Subprime mortgage lender shares
fall sharply
2/17/07 - Knowledge@Wharton; Could
Tremors in the Subprime Mortgage Market Be the First
Signs of an Earthquake?
2/16/07 - Bloomberg
Press; Subprime
Mortgage Derivatives Tumble for a Fourth Straight
Week
2/13/07 - Goldman
Sachs; "Subprime mortgage
credit outlook is bleak, prime is fine" (right
click "save
as" here for a PDF)
2/13/07 - Bank
of America; "Short Housing Risk in the Credit Market" (right
click "save as" here for a PDF)
10/19/06 - Los
Angeles Times; More Homeowners Going Into Default
HORP&B Obtain $3.0 Million Jury Verdict in Partnership Dispute
2/18/08 - Press Release
The Law Offices of Heygood, Orr, Reyes, Pearson & Bartolomei announced today the February 15th jury verdict in the amount of $3.0 million for their client, Tony Alardin, in a partnership dispute regarding the development, manufacture and sale of wireless video surveillance trailer systems. (read
more...)
Jenkens & Gilchrist Closing After Admitting Role in Tax Fraud
3/30/07 - The Dallas Morning News
Jenkens & Gilchrist, once the largest law firm in Dallas, has admitted promoting fraudulent tax shelters and will pay the Internal Revenue Service $76 million and go out of business, the IRS and the U.S. attorney in New York announced Thursday. (read
more...)
Non-compete Agreement Ruled No Basis for Damages
12/21/06 - New York Law Journal
A lawyer who signed a non-compete agreement with his former firm cannot claim damages on the grounds that the agreement is barred by New York state disciplinary rules, a Manhattan federal judge has ruled. (read
more...)